Enfield-Rifles.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Enfields > Enfield Bayonets
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - '07' Frog Studs
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

'07' Frog Studs

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Sarge View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2013
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sarge Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: '07' Frog Studs
    Posted: May 17 2013 at 7:39pm
The subject of which version of the Pattern-1907 Bayonet Scabbard 'Frog-Stud' is correct for WW1... has always been one of contention. Why? That is one question in which I have no answer to give.

There are two variations of the 'Frog-Stud' in use, the 'PEARDROP', and the 'ROUNDEL'.



Both versions are period correct for WW1. I have maintained this since the begining my collecting career. Many refuse to accept that the 'Roundel' is WW1 period correct, referring to it as the WW2 variant. Why? I have seen many '07' collectors refuse a scabbard with the 'Roundel', and swap over a scabbard which has a 'Peardrop'... discarding the 'Roundel' in open disgust!

For some unexplained reason, there seems to be a myth which has grown up and attached itself to the 'Roundel'. When did this misinformation begin? How did it start? What was the reason? All of those questions I'm certain we will never be able to solve. I personally have no answer. All that one can do is search out the period correct information in reference to the items concerned, then endeavour to re-educate those who have been misinformed. We must also do our best to block out such inaccuracies for those who are entering the hobby.

In order to set the seal, the following is taken from the official 'LOC's = List of Changes.

19th November 1915.
LOC-17883 - Scabbard, Sword Bayonet, Pattern-1907, No.1, MK.II.

Modifications which may be embodied in future manufacture.

Furniture...   
A circular, instead of pear-shaped stud fitted to the locket.
Ends of locket and chape left square instead of being figured.

My personal view on the above, is that the change was inline with the need to manufacture items required at a faster pace. Thus... the need to streamline production. It is far easier to manufacture a 'Circle' and 'Straight edge'... than it is to manufacture an edited custom design.

For '07' collectors, I would suggest an idea which I practice in my own collection. For pre-1916 manufactured items, I endeavour to match the bayonet with a 'Peardrop'. For '07' Hooked Quillions, its a must for the 'Peardrop', for a 'Roundel' would look seriously out-of-place. For 1916 onwards... anything goes!
This is MY rifle, there are many like, but this one... is MINE!
Back to Top
A square 10 View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member
Avatar
Donating Member

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: MN , USA
Status: Offline
Points: 14452
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote A square 10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 19 2013 at 9:55pm
thats a nice explanation of this subtlety , seems this LOC corresponds to the mkIII/mkIII* for the most part , also production increasing changes , i likewise have taken your approach with matching ,
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.