Enfield-Rifles.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Off Topic > OT Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - A gripping story
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

A gripping story

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 2969
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2021 at 3:03pm
The shoulder stock is not illegal to own (not yet anyway).  Who knows, they may pass legislation on pistols designed in the 1800’s as “assault pistols” and ban them.  This pistol is over 100 years old now. 


Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
A square 10 View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member

Donating Member

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: MN , USA
Status: Offline
Points: 11710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote A square 10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2021 at 9:53pm
there are exceptions , some vintage items are exempt to the SBR classification , but id not advertise anything these days as they are trying to steal our second amendment rights , 

this when they are constantly protecting the killing of innocent babies and screaming that they have that right , they claim we want to steal that "right" from them when killing babies is not protected by our constitution , im not at all sure why we put up with this but at least the dialog is still open ? 
Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 2969
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2021 at 5:31am
Yes, the C97 is one of the exceptions.  But, it’s probably best to delete these photos, which I will do....we are heading in a bad direction in regards to our second amendment rights.  Old Joe said  “no amendments are absolute”.  I bet there are a few amendments that the Dems would say are absolute...he just didn’t think that statement through.


Back to Top
A square 10 View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member

Donating Member

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: MN , USA
Status: Offline
Points: 11710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote A square 10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 11 2021 at 6:49pm
he cant think anything thru anymore , that said i agree there will be some they might want as absolute but they will pick and choose - we need to go after the things they care of or just rid ourselves of them altogether , we have lived within our constitution for a long time - there is no reason to weaken it in any way , there is no reason for two of our three separate entities of government to try to change the third , these were set up to prevent the exact takeover of power that they are attempting , the founders foresaw this and established us such that this could not happen , we cannot allow it - they want us disarmed to facilitate their agenda , it has to be stopped , 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.