Another need help identifying |
Post Reply |
Author | |
Blatt
Newbie Joined: October 02 2012 Location: Pretoria Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: October 02 2012 at 3:12pm |
Hi Guys
I have a 303 Sporterized Lee Enfield Rifle. From reading on the internet I have found that it was manufactured at RSAF. I also know that it is a MK3 of some sorts. I suspect it is a SMLE MK3 but the writings on it is a bit different from what I have found. The SMLE is written with something else replacing the M Underneath SMLE the MK number appears as a III but next to it there are two horizontal markins. Can you please help me identify what the symbols are, the one replacing the M in SMLE and the one next to the number III |
|
A square 10
Special Member Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 14452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
well , i believe that "M" replacement is an "HT" , the abreviation for 'short'
but the one next to the III is a cancelled star * , meaning this was returned to mkIII status between the wars , before it was sported
|
|
Blatt
Newbie Joined: October 02 2012 Location: Pretoria Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks for the reply.
I wonder why they would have returned it to MKIII status rather than keeping it MKIII*. Would they not need to change the internal workings for that. Have you ever seen this before? |
|
Lithgow
Senior Member Joined: October 25 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The main difference between the MkIII and the MkIII* was that the III had the volley sights and the cutoff. The internal workings were the same.
|
|
303Guy
Senior Member Joined: July 10 2012 Location: Auckland Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That is a badly stamped SHTLE III(*?) for Short Lee Enfield Mk III (?).
This is a SHTLE I This is the difference - it had an integral clip charger guide on one side with the rest of the guide on the bolt head. Sadly, the bolt head bit has been removed!
|
|
303Guy
|
|
Blatt
Newbie Joined: October 02 2012 Location: Pretoria Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Wow I am really glad I joined this forum, you guys really know your enfields.
303Guy I dont know if that is badly stamped because the stamp is quite clear but I am still reluctant to believe that it is the short as I have seen the HT before on other Enfields. What are the main differences between the SMLE and the SHTLE maybe I can figure it out that way. I have another 303 but sadly it has been disabled, I know it was date stamped 1901 but I dont know the other markings, I will have to have a look. |
|
303Guy
Senior Member Joined: July 10 2012 Location: Auckland Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Ummm ... I'm a novice here but you are right. It is not badly stamped. It is however, a new to me marking and way of stamping 'SHT' but SHT it is. I can now make out the letters. That symbol after the III is probably a '*' too. Would you mind posting more photo's of that rifle? The more the better.
Here is a sample of other stampings. |
|
303Guy
|
|
Lithgow
Senior Member Joined: October 25 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
In the case of your rifle, there is absolutely no difference between a SHTLE and an SMLE. What you have is a No1 MkIII.
It appears to have been quite deeply stamped in that area to me.
|
|
muffett.2008
Senior Member Joined: December 09 2011 Location: scone. nsw Status: Offline Points: 751 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Technically, that is incorrect, although later the early rifles were all lumped in with the SMLE's the actual differences were many.
Nosecap, Volley sights(up to Mk.III) cutoff, sliding charger bridge, magazine and ball and seat trigger, plus a few other minor ones.
I prefer to call them Short Lees, that's what they are, despite some down the line name change. |
|
Lithgow
Senior Member Joined: October 25 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That would be comparing the MkI to the MkIII I believe. The rifle pictured in the original post is a MkIII.
Perhaps my last post was not clear. The rifle is marked SHTLE and is a MkIII so in the case of this particular rifle, they are the same.
|
|
A square 10
Special Member Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 14452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
and yes it was a mkIII* but returned to mkIII status between the wars as was common then , and the * struck through to cancel it , it became a no1 rifle in the 20s when they made that retroactive
BTW it may all seem a little confusing but when you sit down and read it thru it will bein to make sense
|
|
303Guy
Senior Member Joined: July 10 2012 Location: Auckland Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Thanks.
|
|
303Guy
|
|
A square 10
Special Member Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 14452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
no worries , it was made as a mkIII* as all were into the change by 1918 ,
i also wanted to mention it was made at "ROF Enfeild" , the royal ordnance factory , not RSAF as sugested ,
|
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |