![]() |
Early pre-war RFI 1907 |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Author | |
Enfield trader ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: May 11 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 649 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: May 24 2022 at 6:27pm |
![]() |
|
Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
terrylee ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 30 2014 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 624 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Excellent! First I've seen.
|
|
![]() |
|
A square 10 ![]() Special Member ![]() Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 13196 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
im not familiar with the early RFI stuff but yours looks to be in really nice shape , congrats
|
|
![]() |
|
lance ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: July 19 2011 Location: Connecticut Status: Offline Points: 14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great find! RFI only produced around 4,000 examples in 1913-14 so any examples is rare.
|
|
![]() |
|
Enfield trader ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: May 11 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 649 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That’s for posting that info on the bayonet. The bayonet goes well with the 1918 RFI SMLE.
|
|
![]() |
|
terrylee ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 30 2014 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 624 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The cause of my envy! ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Enfield trader ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: May 11 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 649 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very nice - I’ll get some pics of mine
|
|
![]() |
|
lance ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: July 19 2011 Location: Connecticut Status: Offline Points: 14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here you go Terry! FYI my '11 is 22036
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
terrylee ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 30 2014 Location: South Africa Status: Offline Points: 624 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A really excellent combination for a collection! Unfortunately, my Ishapore Pat. 1907 is dated 1940. However, it can still be historically linked to the rifle since my Ishapore SMLE Mk III's markings indicate that it was from the batch imported by South Africa from India during WW II.
|
|
![]() |
|
Sarge ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 20 2013 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 495 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Gentlemen....
We all like to find and aquire unique examples for our collections. However, in this case I feel that it may be a tad premature in celebration. To my eyes... it looks as though foul-play is evident. If you look to the rear of '7' as marked withing the red square, you'll not a smaller but much fainter figure '7'. Also... please study the area around the figure '3' as highlighted withing the second red square. You will not a vert faint outline of a figure '8', to which the '3' has been very carefully laid atop of. In my opinion, this RFI was actually manufactured in '7-18' ---> July 1918. Sarge. ![]() |
|
This is MY rifle, there are many like, but this one... is MINE!
|
|
![]() |
|
Goosic ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 12 2017 Location: Phoenix Arizona Status: Offline Points: 7608 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sarge. I cleaned the photo up a bit and found another 7 next to the 13. The 13 does not appear to have been tampered with rather the whole date code was scrubbed and an earlier one restamped. It is interesting to note that, all of the 7's are in the exact same font...
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Sarge ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 20 2013 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 495 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Goosic...
Both fonts certainly appear to be the same, but the fainter example being the smaller of the two. There certainly does look to have been some scullduggery and shenanigans applied to this 07. Where those who are not entirely honest in their dealings are involved, there is no telling as to what they are thinking when carrying out their deceptions. One factor however is a constant-----> MONEY. I've seen some really terrible tampering's in my time, ( this is one of the better ones ) trying to be what they ( after a simple glance ) obviously are not. After studying the shadow of the erased year stamp you found ( which I must admit to not seeing initially ). It does appear that the complete original manufacture date is - 7/18. Examples of RFI for WW1 are quite rare, so producing an example for pre-war would bring in quite a premium from dedicated collectors. I don't wish to know what you paid for this example, but hope it wasn't too high above the average for WW1 '07'. I've learned over the years to examine a piece more objectively than simply looking at the obvious. Yes... like many of us, I was caught out in my early years by such examples Your RFI example is certainly a good talking point, and leads itself open to quite a lot more in-depth research. |
|
This is MY rifle, there are many like, but this one... is MINE!
|
|
![]() |
|
lance ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: July 19 2011 Location: Connecticut Status: Offline Points: 14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I disagree, I think you still have an original 1913 manufactured bayonet that has only been de-hooked. The faint ghosting marks are the same font suggesting either it was poorly struck the first time or the blade was not removed and the stamp "rested" on the blade prior to its complete removal giving a ghost mark. The 1918 Ishapore P1907 bayonet font is very different. First it is a much heavier stamp, removal would be hard. Second the size of the markings, especially the"RFI" is much larger, this size change occurred in 1917 Third, the Monarch Crown changed from a flat base to a curved base in 1915-16
|
|
![]() |
|
A square 10 ![]() Special Member ![]() Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 13196 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
with the indians propensity for scrubbing and refurbing i wonder if this might have been redone ? im not disputing that the coincidence of the seventh month being repeated might make one question that , but then again we must throw out the possibilities in these discussions ,
|
|
![]() |
|
Sarge ![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 20 2013 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 495 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
'Lance'... 'A Square 10'.. This is why I love this forum. The ability to voice our opinions in regard to a specific piece, then have a damned good ole fashioned in-depth discussion... without anyone becoming offended.
'Lance'... There is a very simple way to ascertain if the main discussion item is in fact a 'Quillion' Removed example. The profile of such an item is slimmer to that of a post 1913 production item. 'Enfield Trader'... would it be possible for you to post an end-on profile photo of the lower portion of the bayonets crossguard? |
|
This is MY rifle, there are many like, but this one... is MINE!
|
|
![]() |
|
Shamu ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Logo Designer / Donating Member Joined: April 25 2007 Location: MD, USA. Status: Offline Points: 15839 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
^^^^ this.We can discuss & have opposing views but its all together a bunch of "gun guys" chewing the fat. THIS is why I like this place & will fight to l\keep it this way. For all of us. |
|
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |