Acceptable Groups |
Post Reply |
Author | |
mausernut
Groupie Joined: March 11 2017 Location: Manitoba Canada Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: April 17 2017 at 10:23am |
Not sure if this is where to ask this. Am currently reloading for sporterised BSA No 1 Mk 111 That has a Parker - Hale barrel on it.
Best groups so far are 2 " or slightly less. My question is should I keep trying for a better load or is this as good as it will ever be?
|
|
if you can't be an example, be WARNING
Hunter Safety Instructor Canadian Firearms Safety Course Istructor Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course Instructor |
|
Pukka Bundook
Senior Member Joined: February 02 2015 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1369 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It appears you haven't been swamped with replies, Mr Mauser. :-)
I'd say that was very good as is, if range is 100 yards. If it were me, (being curious and all that,) I'd still try and improve but there is nothing wrong with that as is for a sporting rifle! Most guns shoot better than we can hold them so enjoy it as you go. Best, Richard. |
|
Shamu
Admin Group Logo Designer / Donating Member Joined: April 25 2007 Location: MD, USA. Status: Offline Points: 17603 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
How many rounds in the group?
Group size expands with more shots. Handloads or factory? Handloads frequently beat factory. |
|
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
|
mausernut
Groupie Joined: March 11 2017 Location: Manitoba Canada Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I do 3 shot groups as I go up in powder. Usually wait 1 minute between shots and then walk down and measure the groups. When I get a load I like I will do 3-3 shot groups for a hunting rifle and 2-5 shot groups with a varmint rifle. This is all done off a benchrest with shooting bags in my backyard at 100 yards.
The rifle I am using is in Aftermarket Enfields as my second Lee Enfield. Am not done with this gun yet and will try more combinations.
|
|
if you can't be an example, be WARNING
Hunter Safety Instructor Canadian Firearms Safety Course Istructor Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course Instructor |
|
Shamu
Admin Group Logo Designer / Donating Member Joined: April 25 2007 Location: MD, USA. Status: Offline Points: 17603 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That's pretty good. Maybe one more tight ring round (+/- 2/10 Gr) to test for a sweet spot.
I can get 2" for 10-rounds @100yd. out of my No4 so maybe there's a little extra yet. Those rounds are precision loaded (primer uniformed, neck sized, reamed chamferd & so on) with all brass & bullets individually weighed)so there's eventually a rule of diminishing returns to consider. |
|
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
|
Long Tom
Newbie Joined: May 05 2017 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Dear Mausernut,
Sorry this is late. I am brand new here but I feel I have had some experience so here goes from NZ. You do not say how many rounds, factory, miltary or reloads or if iron sights or scope. I will assume you have a bright shiney bore and good iron sights and that you can shoot. 2" for a five shot group is about what the rifle is capable of if in good condition, off a rest with commercial ammo. I once thought "that was that" for LE accuracy until I bumped into 'Chris' one day at the range and watched his No4 scoped match rifle (.308) clean up everyone else including myself in a general CF Rifle match at 100yd. I was really impressed with it. And the trigger was original but 'tuned'. His group was truly tiny. So there you go. I will add that often these lovely smooth old rifles will shoot gas checked lead bullets better than jacketed. And I would be careful (get a magnet) to avoid steel pills too. Stuart. Ak-NZ
|
|
My firearms are not weapons. They are for my own enjoyment and pleasure.
|
|
mausernut
Groupie Joined: March 11 2017 Location: Manitoba Canada Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This gun has been sporterised by Parker Hale. It was a BSA but the barrel is Parker Hale, and it has a Parker Hale side mount on it. Bushnell Elite 3200 3 x 9 on it. I think it should do better than that. There are pictures of it in After Market Enfields.
Problem is my range time is zero right now as it is seeding time. Working long hours 7 days a week. If things keep going the way they are we will be done in another week.
|
|
if you can't be an example, be WARNING
Hunter Safety Instructor Canadian Firearms Safety Course Istructor Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course Instructor |
|
dodgyrog
Newbie Joined: April 30 2010 Location: Consett UK Status: Offline Points: 19 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Depending on the state of the barrel I'd expect 1" or thereabouts at 100 yards
|
|
mausernut
Groupie Joined: March 11 2017 Location: Manitoba Canada Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Found part of my problem. Some idiot who shall remain nameless wasn't thinking (me). I bought some new brass for this gun as I had to throw out the brass I was using because of imminent web separation. Reloaded some of the brass I had fired in this gun that was neck sized and got much better groups. One is as low as .25", unless I missed the target completely with one bullet. Next best group is 1.25". Much happier with these results.
|
|
if you can't be an example, be WARNING
Hunter Safety Instructor Canadian Firearms Safety Course Istructor Canadian Restricted Firearms Safety Course Instructor |
|
britrifles
Senior Member Joined: February 03 2018 Location: Atlanta, GA Status: Online Points: 6539 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
This thread is several months old, but the search for accuracy just never stops.
I now wished I had not done so much “load development”. Im sure I shot several thousand rounds on the bench trying to figure out how to wring out the smallest group sizes with my No.4. When I started, it had a new barrel fitted (service weight) and accurzed by Fulton’s at Bisley Camp in the 1960s for target shooting. Fitted with a PH 5c aperture sight. My method was to fire 10 shot groups at 100 yards off the bench and measure the windage and elevation spread. I recorded every group. For some loads, I fired multiple strings of 10 shot groups, as many as 10. The load I settled on had an AVERAGE spread of 1.3 inch windage and 1.5 inch elevation. Several groups came in Sub-MOA. I quickly learned that shooting one 5 shot group gave no indication at all how well a particular load would do ON AVERAGE as compared to others. Some loads would have 9 out of 10 shots in one ragged hole with one flier, others would be scattered, but the same overall extreme spread. The British method used at the Royal Laboratory of firing 20 shot groups and calculating the mean radial dispersion of the shots from the group geometric center (Figure of Merit) makes a lot of sense when judging accuracy of a particular firearm and it’s ammunition. My current interest is to shoot in Vintage Military Rifle Matches, and all that bench rest shooting did was to erode the barrel throat. It did nothing to improve my position shooting skills. On a good day, the No. 4 will still hold 2 MOA, and I can sometimes do that prone, but 3 MOA extreme spread is probably more typical for prone shooting at the 200 yard target. Last year I shot a 10 round group at just under 2 MOA Prone at 600 yds that scored a 97 on the NRA MR-1 target but I have not been able to repeat that. The first five shots were just over 1 MOA in the pic below. There are a lot of shooters out there way better than me and I’ve often wondered just how good they were with this rifle back in the day when it ruled the service rifle matches. And back then, they used service ammunition, although likely special runs that tested with a low FOM. Ive got some DAC’51 “Match” ammunition that was used in the 1952 DCRA matches and it is indeed exceptional, it shoots almost as good as my 174 gr SMK handloads. But now I’m just rambling... |
|
pogson
Newbie Joined: July 10 2018 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 17 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That's much better but anyone can be lucky a few times. In searching for an accurate combination one should try to minimize the worst group... The keys to good accuracy in almost any rifle is to choose the right components and to assemble them very uniformly every time. Things that help me:
Neck-sizing alone can cut groups in half. These other measures can do that as well. I have only one rifle that shoots commercial ammunition as well as my reloads. I don't know what's wrong with it... For fun, I took two young friends out to the bush so they could try their brand new rifles and commercial ammunition. I took a ~100 year old rifle with no bluing and rifling that came and went down the bore. I got better groups... Of course I was only fifty years old then. I'm a little more shaky now. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |