Powder type and projectiles weight |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
philtno
Senior Member Joined: May 04 2019 Location: Blenheim, NZ Status: Offline Points: 261 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi Britrifles, Thanks a lot for the really good info and the results of your experimentation with various loadings. To answer your question, no I can't guarantee I was using the same exact settings for the rear sight. I have to admit that my expectations are pretty simple when I shoot....it groups well, I'm happy....it doesn't group well, I'm grumpy I take a few notes but I'm not in such a total control of my shooting to be able to provide the same level of analysis This being said, I like experimenting as well and try to replicate o use the other shooters' experience...... I understand that, at the distance I'm shooting, probably half a grain of powder would probably not make much difference....on the other hand, I'm of the opinion that, unless you try to control as many parameters as possible, you can't complain if the results are either not consistent or simply not what you expect. Plus, and that's probably what drives the most, IT'S FUN....it's fun putting efforts in measuring the powder exactly, setting the bullet the way you think/heard/read it should be, trying other powder, other projectiles....it's part of the hobby....and I don't see myself abandoning this to favour any "yeaaaaaa,naaaahhh, she'll be roooiit" way of doing things. What you're doing with the chart you provided is really AMAZING..., I'm serious....and I admire people committing to that level of marksmanship....I wish I would reach that level of control/understanding of how it works when I pull the trigger...one day |
|
britrifles
Senior Member Joined: February 03 2018 Location: Atlanta, GA Status: Offline Points: 6539 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
I had done the test originally for a completely different reason. I did not have a Chronometer at the time and wanted to compare the MPI of my handloads with MK 7 service ammunition. The other data points shown on the plot are various Canadian service loads, SA PMP, Greek HXP and PMC Match ammo. Ignore the horizontal axis values (grains) for the service/commercial ammo data points.
In the search to identify causes of inaccuracy and improve my shooting, I don't want to worry about things that have little or no impact. I spent way to long tinkering with loads, thinking this would improve accuracy, searching for that "magic" load that shrunk my groups considerably. My conclusion was after 20 years of doing this, the rifle will perform well with a wide range of powders and charge weights. The biggest cause of inaccuracy is the shooter, unless there is something very wrong with the rifle. I later went back to this experiment to conclude that precise weighing of charges has very little benefit. If you handload 150 or more rounds a week, it gets very tedious and time consuming to trickle charge and weigh every charge. I'm not the only one that has concluded this, many of the top competitive Service Rifle (including vintage class) shooters do not weigh charges, at least for matches out to 200 yards. I do periodically check weight of the thrown charge, and certainly for the first few rounds I'm loading to be sure I've set the measure correctly. Typically, the charge is to within +/- 0.1 grains, occasionally 0.2 grains of the desired weight. |
|
Honkytonk
Senior Member Joined: December 30 2017 Location: Brandon Mb Status: Offline Points: 4770 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Great point. I shoot probably 400 rounds through various Enfield during the summer months. Our range is 100 yards. I pretty much limit my hunting "comfort zone" distance to 200 yards, meaning, if it's past that, I'll probably pass, unless it is that "pink mist", standing broad side shot. Even then, unless I have a rest (tree, fence post) I would pass. I reload probably on average 50 rounds in a sitting, but in stages. Deprime, size, champher/debur, tumble one day. Prime another day. Powder and projectile the final sitting. I have never trickled, but check every 5th powder charge on the scale to see if everything is good, or if I "feel" anything but a smooth pull on the powder measurer lever. So far, it seems to work for me.
|
|
Zed
Special Member Donating Member Joined: May 01 2012 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 5585 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I invested in a Lyman electronic balance/doser system last year. It works really well; you type in the required weight and the repeat function and it will give accurate loads.
It is very handy when loading test weights; makes life easy!
|
|
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice!
|
|
Honkytonk
Senior Member Joined: December 30 2017 Location: Brandon Mb Status: Offline Points: 4770 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yikes! Buddy bought one of those! I use an old and trusted RCBS 505 balance bar scale... and equally old RCBS powder measurer, and an ancient Case press. RCBS dies and she!! holder. My polisher is an old Thumler Tumbler loaded with iguana bedding and Brasso... I bought that rock tumbler 28 years ago for one of my girls... when she outgrew it, she gave it to me.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |