Enfield-Rifles.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Enfields > Info for New Enfield Owners
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - My first No. 4 Mk 1/2 What is it?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

My first No. 4 Mk 1/2 What is it?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
KC9AOP View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KC9AOP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: My first No. 4 Mk 1/2 What is it?
    Posted: November 15 2013 at 1:34pm
he!!o,

I've just bought my first No. 4 Mk. 1/2 and could use your help identifying it.  I can easily see it is a No. 4 Mk.1/2 made in 1942.  It went for FTR in 1951.  The Armorer stamped it with an "A" so it has some non-interchangeable parts.  Past that I am unsure of anything else.  I've attached photos of what looks like the significant markings.  Since this was a FTR it was repainted.  I suspect most of the barrel markings are under the new coat of paint but I really don't know.



















Hopefully this will be something to go on.  Anything you can tell me would be appreciated.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
MaxP View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: March 21 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 184
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MaxP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 15 2013 at 2:29pm
The No4 isn't an SMLE, common misconception ....
I can't help much on the specific markings as the No4 is not my field.... The first pic shows import markings, not military.
Back to Top
KC9AOP View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KC9AOP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2013 at 1:41am
Thanks for the correction.  I changed the post title.

Jim
Back to Top
SW28fan View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member
Avatar
Donating Member

Joined: July 02 2007
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2644
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SW28fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2013 at 7:41am
The No4 Mk1/2 is a No4 Mk1 that was upgraded during the FTR with the No4 Mk2 trigger. The new trigger assembly was brazed on the receiver. Depending on the need  the upgraded No4s may have gotten a new barrel and/or wood as well.  A No4 Mk 1/3 is an upgraded No4 Mk1* btw. These upgrades tend to be in good condition, or atleast the ones I have come accross.  I have a Faz No4 1/2 that is one of my best shooters.
Have a Nice Day
If already having a nice day please disregard
Back to Top
A square 10 View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member

Donating Member

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: MN , USA
Status: Offline
Points: 10705
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote A square 10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2013 at 8:51am
a FTR was done in the 51 date , not certain if that was the change to mk2 or if it had another after that , the mk2 FTRs were done by FAZ , your rifle was built in a british factory but im not at all certain by whats posted which one , some markings may have been done by the point of use country , 
Back to Top
KC9AOP View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KC9AOP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2013 at 1:58pm
Is there something else that will help identify this rifle? I have more photos but did not want to flood the thread with useless pics.

The photos I have are kind of hard to see. There are marks that I can't decypher. I think the 51 is a makers mark along with the C on the plate where the butt stock attaches. There are more marks on the wood. The one in the photo may mean the stock was in South Africa at some point. There is clearly an arrow right below the trigger guard and I believe that means it was sold out of the military.

There is nothing on the barrel near the bayonet lug. The front site has numbers on it. The micrometer has a few marks as well. The bolt has a bunch of marks but if the rifle was refurbished I don't know if it has the original bolt anyway.

I'll be happy to post pics of whatever helps. Just let me know.

Jim
Back to Top
Shamu View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Logo Designer / Donating Member

Joined: April 25 2007
Location: MD, USA.
Status: Offline
Points: 12432
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shamu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2013 at 10:46pm
It was imported By Century after 1968. That's the "CAI ST a VT" stamp, before '68 it would just have had "ENGLAND' stamped.
Might the "F51" be a 1951 Fazakerly barrel?
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
Back to Top
KC9AOP View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KC9AOP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2013 at 9:47am
I just discovered that the cocking piece is stamped "DP".  That's the only DP I can find on entire gun.  I've ordered a replacement piece but is it really necessary?  I know the DP is not necessarily a sign of a defective part (I know DP = Drill Purposes not defective part) but I want to be careful.  This is a full FTR so I'm a bit confused  Would an armorer use a DP part in an FTR? 
Back to Top
SW28fan View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member
Avatar
Donating Member

Joined: July 02 2007
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2644
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SW28fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2013 at 12:33pm
It may not have been a armorer or atleast a British Military armorer. Someone somewhere in the rifle's history may have swapped out the original which may have had some surface defects with one from a DP rifle or a pile of parts that looked better.  I used a "DP" marked band on a sporterised  rifle I restored a few years ago.
Have a Nice Day
If already having a nice day please disregard
Back to Top
Lithgow View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: October 25 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1417
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lithgow Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2013 at 8:30pm
Does the bolt and action serial numbers match? Make sure it's not a DP bolt.
Back to Top
Bear43 View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member
Avatar
Donating Member

Joined: August 11 2010
Location: Doland, SD
Status: Offline
Points: 2710
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bear43 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2013 at 10:39pm
You did the right thing to replace the cocking piece. When a part is marked DP you have no idea why it was marked such and parts that are pressure bearing or make it go boom cannot be trusted. Bands and wood are fine to use, but I too would replace that cocking piece with a good one. And no, no armourer would have replaced a defective part with a DP part. Once a part was DP'd it was essentially a death sentence for said part as far as the military was concerned.
Back to Top
paddyofurniture View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 26 2011
Location: NC
Status: Offline
Points: 3780
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote paddyofurniture Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 29 2013 at 10:41pm
In my "stores box" I still have a few trigger guards left I think with the trigger still mounted.

What was a better trigger the original or the changed / up grade?
Always looking for military manuals, Dodge M37 items,books on Berlin Germany, old atlases ( before 1946) , military maps of Scotland. English and Canadian gun parts.
Back to Top
A square 10 View Drop Down
Special Member
Special Member

Donating Member

Joined: December 12 2006
Location: MN , USA
Status: Offline
Points: 10705
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote A square 10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2013 at 12:12am
i did not think to check the serial number but ... the 10900 [if im reading it right] is the range assigned to maltby , assuming it was not changed , which is unlikely save the "A" sufix being added , 
they used the prefix A-Z and AA - BZ , 
Back to Top
Jon287 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 19 2013
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 367
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jon287 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2013 at 12:35am
Originally posted by paddyofurniture paddyofurniture wrote:

In my "stores box" I still have a few trigger guards left I think with the trigger still mounted.

What was a better trigger the original or the changed / up grade?
I think the forearm stock is different between the No4 Mk1 and the No4 Mk2, as well as the way the trigger is mounted. They can't be swapped back and forth that easily.
Please be aware that I don't own a No.4 Mk2, it is just what I have gathered from reading. If I am wrong , someone correct me!
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their planet!!
Back to Top
Shamu View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Logo Designer / Donating Member

Joined: April 25 2007
Location: MD, USA.
Status: Offline
Points: 12432
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shamu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2013 at 1:16am
Correct!
The Mk1 had the trigger attached to the actual guard. The change with the Mk2 was to braze a "hanger", (read piece of steel) to the front of the receiver ring & attach the trigger to that. There was no attachment for the trigger on the trigger guard of Mk2's.

This is the "hanger" & trigger of a Mk2.


The forend of the Mk2 has a cut for the "hanger" & a cross bolt fastening it to the "hanger" by screw tension/friction. Unlike the Mk1's metal riveted in strap.

Supposedly the change made an improvement to the consistency of trigger pull as the forend wood swelling & shrinking by moisture absorption effecting trigger feel was removed. Having had both I really can't tell the difference, but my wood is probably pampered compared to trench warfare life!
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
Back to Top
KC9AOP View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2013
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KC9AOP Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2013 at 1:49am
The cocking piece is the only thing marked DP on the bolt. Could the whole bolt be DP if just the cocking piece is marked?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.