![]() |
SMLE Front Sight Removal |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
Overlord500
Newbie
Joined: March 08 2011 Location: Vermont, USA Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: SMLE Front Sight RemovalPosted: March 08 2011 at 11:22am |
|
Hi folks,
It's a pleasure to have found this forum. I own 3 (4, if you count the US Model 1917) Enfield rifles. A 1918 Enfield No. 1 III*, a 1943 No. 4 1/2., and a sporterized Lithgow 1942 No. 1 III*. I'm in the process of restoring the Lithgow back to it's service appearance. I only paid 90$ for it, including tax, so it was a great deal. Nice bore, correct numbers, etc. I've purchased the correct wooden parts and am assembling all of the missing screws, bands, etc. My question is, to replace the "inner band" on the front of the rifle, it looks like I will need to remove the front sight. How is this done? In examining the sight, this wasn't clear to me. Also, what are the "fore end stud" and "fore end spring" used for? I can't find them on my complete SMLE and have no idea where they go. If anyone out there has removed the front sight, please let me know how it's done. Also any other expertise in restoring this rifle would be helpful. Thanks. David C. in Vermont, USA. |
|
![]() |
|
Lithgow
Senior Member
Joined: October 25 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 08 2011 at 9:24pm |
|
The sight is held on by a cross pin and has a small key to keep the sight straight.
drive the pin out and then tap the sight block forward using a block of wood and hammer.
|
|
![]() |
|
Bear43
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: August 11 2010 Location: Doland, SD Status: Offline Points: 3500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 08 2011 at 9:33pm |
|
Since Lithgow helped you with the front sight, I will help with the fore-end stud and fore-end spring. Those pieces are very important. The stud and spring go into the fore-end. When the rifle is together the spring pushes against the nosecap and that in turn pushes the stud against the barrel providing the necessary upward pressure on the barrel. That pressure is important to accuracy. So, you need to get those parts and put them in. |
|
![]() |
|
Overlord500
Newbie
Joined: March 08 2011 Location: Vermont, USA Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 09 2011 at 8:08am |
|
Thanks so much guys, I will take a crack at this soon. I received my inner band today, so getting that front sight off is now a priority. I'll add those two parts to my list of "needed" items. I've been whittling it down.
You might end up hearing from me again. This is a new challenge for me, but I'm having fun. Thanks again. David C. |
|
![]() |
|
Lithgow
Senior Member
Joined: October 25 2005 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1417 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 09 2011 at 4:09pm |
|
I hope we do hear from you again.
Let us know how it all goes.
|
|
![]() |
|
Overlord500
Newbie
Joined: March 08 2011 Location: Vermont, USA Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 10 2011 at 8:08am |
|
I will definitely keep posting here. I'm sure I'll need advice on sighting the rifle back in, among other things. Today, I took a little wood off the stock to fit the receiver and will need to take a little more off. I'm hoping not to need to use any fiberglass epoxy to get it bedded. The old stock I took off had been arsenal repaired with two brass pads - quite a bit of wood was removed where the trigger assembly/receiver fits into the stock. I think I will list this wood on ebay in case anyone wants to "sporterize" their rifle without destroying their wood. I also finished removing the last of the metal from it and fitting it into the new fore-stock - last piece was the front trigger guard screw sleeve.
I will post pictures of my other three Enfield's as well as this project gun. I'm guessing that you folks consider the US Model 1917 and Enfield given the P-14... Would you like me to post them? Also, is their a "gallery" section of this site, I haven't seen one yet. Thanks again. David C. in VT, USA |
|
![]() |
|
White Rhino
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: May 05 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 10 2011 at 8:12am |
|
Post them with Your progress !!!
|
|
|
"White Rhino"
"Everybody's got to believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer." --W. C. Fields |
|
![]() |
|
Shamu
Admin Group
Logo Designer / Donating Member Joined: April 25 2007 Location: MD, USA. Status: Offline Points: 20510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 10 2011 at 9:43am |
|
You might want to think twice about that.
A lot of the Aussie coach wood stocks had those added as a protector for the shoulders, more were done by Fultons to regulate the rifles as match guns. |
|
|
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
|
|
![]() |
|
A square 10
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 16999 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 10 2011 at 11:06am |
|
welcome - we need photos , we live vicariously here
|
|
![]() |
|
Bear43
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: August 11 2010 Location: Doland, SD Status: Offline Points: 3500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 10 2011 at 10:32pm |
|
Overlord, like Shamu said, those copper pads were used on Lithgows to reinforce the draws of the coachwood stocks. I would hold on to those. Now, one word of advice on doing the stocking up.... Make sure the draws on the receiver fit TIGHT on the fore-end. That is important. I would recommend looking at this as well, very informative on stocking up in case you are not well versed in it.... http://www.milsurps.com/content.php?r=307-Instructions-for-Armourers-1931-%28Part-2-Small-Arms%29
|
|
![]() |
|
Overlord500
Newbie
Joined: March 08 2011 Location: Vermont, USA Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 11 2011 at 9:44am |
|
Thanks for all of the information. Yeah, I saved the brass pads off the old fore-stock, including the mounting screws. The new fore-stock has a lot more wood there - I only took off about a 1/16th of an inch and the for-stock still won't fit on fully - about 1/4 to go before it is in place. However, I have only applied hand pressure, at this point, to press the fore-stock onto the barreled receiver. Should I take a soft wooden block of pine? and try to tap the fore-stock onto the receiver? the fit is tight only be the trigger assembly. This is only the second stock I've fitted to a receiver so I'm still learning how to do this properly. Obviously, I'd rather not have to take off more wood. I'm attaching some pictures of the rifle, as is, and the stock. You can see the lighter wood where I have taken that tiny amount off. Any advice you can give, I'd appreciate it.
FYI, the "cut" in the picture look dramatic, but they are very minor. They travel down at the same angle as the original factory cut. However, as it appeared, that the metal was hitting only in the inner edges, I didn't take the full surface down as you can see in the picture. Should I? I tried to add arrows to show what I am curious about. As I mentioned earlier, the original Lithgow stock had way more wood missing (1/4 inch, I'd say) and had the brass "pads" as well. On another positive note, my rear sight protector and screw and nut arrived today. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Overlord500
Newbie
Joined: March 08 2011 Location: Vermont, USA Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 11 2011 at 10:00am |
|
Sorry for the extra two picture doubles.
Also, the last picture shows how far the new fore-stock fits on. Not too far to go.. I do wonder if gently tapping with a rubber hammer/soft wood buffer would be an idea? However, I'm not sure if that would be too tight... if that's even possible. The two shots below are of my three complete Enfields. The US Model 1917 I bought at a car show (in the swap area) for $50. It was sporterized, was missing many parts... They obviously had no idea what they had. It's number serial number 5xx of the some 2 million that they made in the Eddystone factory. Pretty nice find! And, a fun restoration. In getting the top wood for it, I didn't go crazy trying to stain or re-color it to match the stock - I figured it was best to leave it as it was. Seems there's far more parts out there for this rifle right now than there was 7 years ago. The middle rifle is a Mark 1 III* produced in 1918 by Enfield. It shoots amazingly well - incredibly accurate! My favorite, by far, to shoot of all my vintage military rifles (I have many non-Enfields as well). I bought it, with a 1907 16" blade bayonet, for $199.00 at a gun shop. No import marks on it, either. A great deal. This was in 2002, I believe. Reading the markings on it, it was used by the Australian Department of Defense during WW2. It is stamped with a "R, MAU, 6/45" on the butt-stock, as well. Not sure how it got to the US... The top rifle is a 1943 No. 4 mk 1/2A - if I have this correct. It was refinished after the war from a straight No. 4 mk 1 to the newer designation and then stored. Bought this one for a little over $100.00 from J&G Sales out of Arizona. Shoots nicely, too. I've never gone through and "beautified" this rifle - it's still pretty dark from the chemicals it was stored in. I'm sure J&G didnt' take much effort to really "clean" it, but that's a project for another year. I have the spike bayonet for this one, of course. All of the slings are authentic WW2 Production. If you are curious, or want more pictures, let me know. Thanks for the encouragement to share and for the advice, etc. David C. in VT, USA ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
A square 10
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: December 12 2006 Location: MN , USA Status: Offline Points: 16999 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 11 2011 at 10:29am |
|
those are great photos and thats some nice enfield stuff , thank you , and keep us up-to-date as you go , its looking terrific , what great fun these projects are
and i need to add that you have some very nice rifles there , congrats , i commend what you are doing |
|
![]() |
|
Bear43
Special Member
Donating Member Joined: August 11 2010 Location: Doland, SD Status: Offline Points: 3500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2011 at 5:04am |
|
If you have a rubber mallet, then try to tap the fore-end on. Be gentle. If you then look you will find that the tapping leaves witness marks on the wood and will show you were the metal is touching and where you need to relieve or leave it. Also, read the manual in the link I posted if you haven't done so. It is very informative as to where the metal should be touching and where it should not be. The key thing is to go slow and take your time. The fore-end should fit very tight on the receiver draws (the area you have chiseled a little) and at the front of the butt socket. You are doing good there, but you also need to check to see if the barrel is making contact in the channel. There are areas where the barrel should touch and where it should not. Again, the armourer's manual I posted the link to describes that in great detail. |
|
![]() |
|
Cookie Monster
Special Member
Joined: January 22 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7510 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: March 12 2011 at 9:48am |
Agreed Rhino
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |