Enfield-Rifles.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Enfields > After Market Enfields
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - One piece stock No. 4 Mk I* conversion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

One piece stock No. 4 Mk I* conversion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
Goosic View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 12 2017
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 8842
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Goosic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2022 at 5:08pm
Originally posted by britrifles britrifles wrote:

What you described Goosic is not at all unusual, very commonly done with M1 rifles, turning a “mixmaster” of parts back to period correct configuration.   And collectors will continue for years doing this, some will try convince the buyer that it’s an “original”  issued rifle.   Very astute collectors will know the difference. Much more difficult to do with some nations service rifles, as many parts were serialized.  My Swedish Mauser carbine has serial numbers on just about every part, and they all match. 
I am not certain that you understood what this individual had done to his rifle.
When I had examined it, it had been FTR'd by Fazackerly in 1947 and had a barrel replacement done and in the process had various metal bits replaced with non Savage stamped items.
This, "individual" and I use that word loosely,  went and bought every part he could locate with a square S stamped on it, including a very worn 2 groove Savage barrel and then paid over 700 dollars in labor to have a gunsmith disassemble a perfectly good rifle and reassemble it with a worn out barrel and metal bits that are just short of rusting apart just so he could own a Period Correct No4Mk1* with all matching pieces when he would have been better off leaving the rifle alone in its FTR'd condition. That also included removing the Beechwood stockset that WAS original to the rifle and replacing it with a walnut stockset because,(His Words), "Every S stamped Brit gun I saw had slits on that top wood thing!" He has it for sale right now for 2000.00 and it matters nothing to him that that it probably will not shoot accurately any longer. The FTR'd rear sight WAS a MkI Poole made example but was replaced with a S stamped L flip type. Technically yes, it was a "mixmaster" of parts but done at the Fazackerly factory and was updated with a 5 groove barrel and a MkI micrometer sight so it was still considered "Original" and WAS very much collectable. Now its Period Correct...Thumbs Down
Back to Top
Goosic View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 12 2017
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 8842
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Goosic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 07 2022 at 5:11pm
Originally posted by VinnieBoomBah VinnieBoomBah wrote:

Originally posted by Honkytonk Honkytonk wrote:

One of those Parker Hale scope mounts Goosic had would work. Addley "no drill" mounts use the "ear holes" as one of their anchor points. Maybe get a globe front site sweated on?

A sweated on ramp/globe/post or something is on the list, but I do have an issue with Mission Creep and spending monnies I don't have  . . . 
I have a spare Addley Precision NoTap scope mount that I decided to cutdown and shorten to see if it would be feasible to mount to a receiver that has been cutdown like yours or mine without having to find a piece of angle iron and then an actual scope mount. Initial mockup  looks promising...
Back to Top
VinnieBoomBah View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: August 25 2022
Location: Oregon
Status: Offline
Points: 17
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VinnieBoomBah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2022 at 7:35am
Originally posted by Goosic Goosic wrote:

Originally posted by VinnieBoomBah VinnieBoomBah wrote:

Originally posted by Honkytonk Honkytonk wrote:

One of those Parker Hale scope mounts Goosic had would work. Addley "no drill" mounts use the "ear holes" as one of their anchor points. Maybe get a globe front site sweated on?

A sweated on ramp/globe/post or something is on the list, but I do have an issue with Mission Creep and spending monnies I don't have  . . . 
I have a spare Addley Precision NoTap scope mount that I decided to cutdown and shorten to see if it would be feasible to mount to a receiver that has been cutdown like yours or mine without having to find a piece of angle iron and then an actual scope mount. Initial mockup  looks promising...

I don't have another receiver on hand to compare mine to, but from what I can tell the left receiver wall has not been modified in any way, so any mount that only mounts on the left side of the receiver should work OK.   If anyone missed it in my first post, here is the catalogue from Robert's Wood Products that has the instructions this modification on page 20 - 22

Back to Top
Shamu View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Logo Designer / Donating Member

Joined: April 25 2007
Location: MD, USA.
Status: Offline
Points: 20510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shamu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2022 at 3:10pm
From the pictures the left side receiver wall has been modified in 2 places:
The "square bit, sticking up" for the charger bridge has been removed down to level with the rest of the side wall.
The pivot block for the rear sight pivot has also been lowered to the same alignment.
Neither will be a problem as long as whatever sight mount you use isn't using those place for anything.
Many ND/NT use the rear sight pivot hole though.
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
Back to Top
Honkytonk View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 30 2017
Location: Brandon Mb
Status: Offline
Points: 5190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Honkytonk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2022 at 3:32pm
Addley does use the rear site "ears" and the ejector screw to mount their system. The three holes pictured in the above mock ups must have been drilled for mounting on the receiver, and material has been removed around the ejector screw I assume for clearance to reinstall said screw.
Back to Top
Goosic View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 12 2017
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 8842
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Goosic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2022 at 7:24pm
Originally posted by Honkytonk Honkytonk wrote:

Addley does use the rear site "ears" and the ejector screw to mount their system. The three holes pictured in the above mock ups must have been drilled for mounting on the receiver, and material has been removed around the ejector screw I assume for clearance to reinstall said screw.
I drilled the holes and cut the notch out for the ejector screw HT.
I cut the mount down to match my PH A29 scope base. I only did this because there are alot of "Sporterized/Customized" Enfields out there like mine and the OP's that could benefit from a mount like this. It's already centered over the rifles boreline...
Back to Top
Honkytonk View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 30 2017
Location: Brandon Mb
Status: Offline
Points: 5190
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Honkytonk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 08 2022 at 8:04pm
Yup. That's what I thought! Looks good!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.