Enfield-Rifles.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Enfields > Enfield Accessories
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 1939 Original Lee Enfield No.32 Mk III/MK 3 Sniper
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

1939 Original Lee Enfield No.32 Mk III/MK 3 Sniper

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
kdweste View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: July 07 2024
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 29
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kdweste Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 08 2024 at 5:16pm
Is there a way to tell the difference between an original and an altered by the numbers on the drums?

Back to Top
terrylee View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 30 2014
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 942
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote terrylee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2024 at 1:11am
In comparing my original No 32 Mk III and a later L1A1 Conversion the following can be noted. Firstly, the ranges are both indicated as being up to 10 ie 1000.  However, the L1A1 is also stamped M for metres. Secondly, the L1A1 scope has had some of its original markings cancelled out with new ones added, including L1A1.
Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Georgia, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2024 at 4:20am
There will be differences in the number of clicks between the range index marks on the elevation drum. You might not be able to tell by looking at it, you would have to count clicks between each range index mark then compare with a No. 32 scope.  The L1A1 would have fewer clicks between the range index marks, probably out past 200 yds to account for the flatter trajectory of the 147 grain 7.62 NATO bullet fired at a significantly higher muzzle velocity out of the L42 rifle, compared to the 174 grain .303 Mk 7 bullet out of a No. 4(T).  

But, it’s clearly a L1A1 scope, it is marked so on the tube and on the box. 

This is a minor issue.   Your main issue would be how to install the pads and culminate the scope to the rifle. 


Back to Top
terrylee View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 30 2014
Location: South Africa
Status: Offline
Points: 942
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote terrylee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2024 at 7:27am
Britrifles, You raise an interesting point which I have just tested.  The number of clicks between 0 and  1000 yards on my No.32 Mk III is 59. On the L1A1 the equivalent in metres is 49. And this is over a longer distance.
Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Georgia, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2024 at 8:18am
Yup, the flatter trajectory of the 7.62 NATO boattail bullet, which I think was 147 grains, and longer barrel on the L42 gave considerably higher muzzle velocity than the .303.  That had to reduce bullet drop considerably.  

Muzzle velocity of the .303 Mk 7 bullet was 2440 fps; and probably close to 2800 fps for the 7.62 out of the L42. 

Back to Top
Shamu View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Logo Designer / Donating Member

Joined: April 25 2007
Location: MD, USA.
Status: Offline
Points: 20510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shamu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2024 at 11:43am
[edited]
Yes a 147Gr BT bullet @ 2750 (quoted) Vs a 174 Gr FB one @ 2450.
IIRC the difference is fairly minimal out to about 250 yds. Then it really starts to show up.
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
Back to Top
Mayhem View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 06 2016
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 335
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Mayhem Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 09 2024 at 5:10pm
I hate to nit-pick Shamu but it should be 147 BT versus 174 FB Smile
.303 - Helping Englishmen express their feelings since 1889
Back to Top
kdweste View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: July 07 2024
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 29
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kdweste Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2024 at 8:08am
Thank you everyone for the information. I learned a lot! 
Back to Top
Shamu View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Logo Designer / Donating Member

Joined: April 25 2007
Location: MD, USA.
Status: Offline
Points: 20510
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Shamu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2024 at 11:52am
Yah, finger trouble,sorry.Embarrassed
Don't shoot till you see the whites of their thighs. (Unofficial motto of the Royal Air Force)
Back to Top
britrifles View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 03 2018
Location: Georgia, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8404
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote britrifles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 10 2024 at 12:08pm
The Mk 7 bullet is surprisingly slick.  BC coefficient is not much different from the Sierra 174 grain MK. The nose filler (aluminum or other light materials) make it long for its length.  

Most of the trajectory difference in the 7.62 x 51 load with 147 grain BT as compared to the .303 Mk 7 load is a result of the significantly higher muzzle velocity.


Back to Top
Enfield trader View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: May 11 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 923
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Enfield trader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2024 at 11:02am
I believe the No32 scope was produced in 1941 - it was initially designed for the Bren. I have a 1941 dated scope that I sold off many years back. 
Back to Top
Enfield trader View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: May 11 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 923
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Enfield trader Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 13 2024 at 11:12am
Where is the 1939 date marked on the  scope.  
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.